Skip to main content

Secularism is not bad for people of faith, but for the undecided middle..



*Now with daft autocorrects fixed*
There is a lot of stuff around about militant secularism just now. The banning of prayers in Bideford, the threat to chaplaincy in prison, there are plenty of other examples where faith is seen to be being pushed from the public sphere.

We are told that this is a threat to people of faith. We are told that it is an affront to believers. That is sort of true, but for those of us who profess to follow Christ in Christian faith and practice, persecution is to be expected. Moreover, persecution seems to be a spawning ground for Christian faith. In places of persecution the church has thrived.

So- I'm not sure I agree with David Lammy, Baroness Warsi and others who say the threat is to people of faith per se.

But militant secularism is a threat to the glorious undecided. By the glorious undecided I mean the folks who don't belong to a faith community but do pray. The people who shop on a Sunday but would like a Christian minister to conduct their funeral. The people (maybe 70% of the population) who haven't firmly signed up to any one religion (including secularism).

These glorious undecided are being threatened by militant secularism: because it is removing the nebulous ground on which they stand, sit, sleep and live. Secularism is removing the permission to explore at leisure. The loud voices of this brash new faith are ignoring thousands of years of people's connection to some kind of divine and are telling us all too loudly that all we have is what is now.

I can't help but feel that that is dangerous- not for established faiths, we have enough inherited experience, real experience of the divine and sheer dogma to cope. But for people who are sort of patching together a set of beliefs, the removal of any sense of connection to the 'out there other' will cause damage. Anyone who takes funerals will see how people have a hotch potch of belief that the secularists would deride. But those beliefs are important to make life safe and doable.. Secularists remove them at their peril..

Comments

Alana said…
Really helpful thoughts. Would you mind if I reposted this (with proper attribution, of course, on my blog? I think it's a valuable perspective.
Jude said…
feel free to repost.. and hello!!

Popular posts from this blog

Remembering What I Enjoy..

Occasionally I forget things. Some stuff like birthdays, names and stuff is a normal human thing, and I don't sweat it so much. But I also forget some other stuff which is not so good. I forget what I enjoy. I don't know how it happens but it does from time to time. And its at these moments that I need a bit of help remembering. So- this is a request for help. What do I enjoy doing? What gives me joy? Leave me a comment.

A Broadside: *plot spoiler* for Tory sympathisers

Today some alarming social equality data was released. It said what we all know: if you are poor, you have less opportunities in life. For every £100 a month less income than the median you start school one month behind developmentally. Your vocabulary aged 5 is half what it is for a rich kid if you are in the bottom ten percent of income. Housing tenure stats are even worse. "Only 4 per cent of those of working age living in social housing have degrees, and nearly half have no or only low qualifications. Only half of men and 42 per cent of women of working age living in social housing are in paid work, compared with 89 per cent of men and 81 per cent of women in households with a mortgage." Social housing: by its nature, is grouped (london people ignore this, you are the freaks not the norm). That means that we have allowed ghettoes of poverty and low attainment (not just in a SATS way either). Now it would be easy, and some daft Tory has already done it, to pin this on