Skip to main content

Secularism is not bad for people of faith, but for the undecided middle..



*Now with daft autocorrects fixed*
There is a lot of stuff around about militant secularism just now. The banning of prayers in Bideford, the threat to chaplaincy in prison, there are plenty of other examples where faith is seen to be being pushed from the public sphere.

We are told that this is a threat to people of faith. We are told that it is an affront to believers. That is sort of true, but for those of us who profess to follow Christ in Christian faith and practice, persecution is to be expected. Moreover, persecution seems to be a spawning ground for Christian faith. In places of persecution the church has thrived.

So- I'm not sure I agree with David Lammy, Baroness Warsi and others who say the threat is to people of faith per se.

But militant secularism is a threat to the glorious undecided. By the glorious undecided I mean the folks who don't belong to a faith community but do pray. The people who shop on a Sunday but would like a Christian minister to conduct their funeral. The people (maybe 70% of the population) who haven't firmly signed up to any one religion (including secularism).

These glorious undecided are being threatened by militant secularism: because it is removing the nebulous ground on which they stand, sit, sleep and live. Secularism is removing the permission to explore at leisure. The loud voices of this brash new faith are ignoring thousands of years of people's connection to some kind of divine and are telling us all too loudly that all we have is what is now.

I can't help but feel that that is dangerous- not for established faiths, we have enough inherited experience, real experience of the divine and sheer dogma to cope. But for people who are sort of patching together a set of beliefs, the removal of any sense of connection to the 'out there other' will cause damage. Anyone who takes funerals will see how people have a hotch potch of belief that the secularists would deride. But those beliefs are important to make life safe and doable.. Secularists remove them at their peril..

Comments

Alana said…
Really helpful thoughts. Would you mind if I reposted this (with proper attribution, of course, on my blog? I think it's a valuable perspective.
Jude said…
feel free to repost.. and hello!!

Popular posts from this blog

NO MORE MAGIC BULLET- or why I have stopped watching the West Wing

I love the West Wing. It still rates as one of the most well informed and influential series of the genre. Its speeches have been stolen by people who have osmosed its hope for a better way of doing politics. When we watch it today it holds a very particular kind of resonance because it demonstrates a civility that has been drowned in a sea of hate. It has positive images of a wrestled out faith, is rich with camaraderie and pith and is just good telly.
But its bad for me. 
It pains me to admit this, but the West Wing makes me think I can change the world in a way that is simply not helpful. 
It holds out the present hope that the world can turn on a single conversation. With the brave statement or right turn of phrase one might change the debate, and in turn might change the world entire. The moment in the Oval where they realise that if they take no credit they can save social security. The moment where Donna remembers to pay welfare payments. The realisation that all the NATO people a…

Oxpresidentgate and a Crisis of Generosity

Its been an interesting start to the year for the third sector. As we all get to grips with GDPR (more later), we have been subject to increased media attention as first we reeled from President’s Club revelations to the far deeper impact of this week’s revelations about Oxfam (and others).
There is much that can be written. Undoubtedly there are some in media and politics who will seek to exploit the 1/3 of us who don’t think aid should be sent overseas to change policy off the back of bad behaviour by some people. We could face a drop in giving to international development, as supporting Oxfam is no longer seen as acceptable (like buying a plastic bag). I suspect this will recover at some point, possibly in different form.
However, there is a deeper moral crisis for third sector organisations and my fear is that Christian charities are not immune.
To explore this let me go back a month. The President’s Club- where charities were set to receive significant amounts of money from an…

A very dull post about what I do with my time...

Each year I take a calendar month and record what I do in it. I break each day into twenty minute chunks and note down what happens in each twenty minute block. I don’t do the same for designated Sabbath time (nor do I note each bit of time outside of the beginning and end of a working day, no-one needs to know how long I clean my teeth for).
I categorise each thing that I do (an imperfect science) with a view to getting a handle on what I do with my time. 
This year I did the audit in November (as clergy I always avoid doing this in Lent, Advent or August). 
So- what did I discover?
I work around 55 hours a week. (thats up one hour from last year) That work is spread over five and a half days. The only sabbath day that was interrupted by work was about processing a painful meeting.  Of 26 working days, I worked 12 evenings.
In terms of what I do:
In November 17% of my time was taken up with prayer, reading and learning. Thats a slightly false read as I had a 48 hour away time in there. Prayer…