Skip to main content

Its the law thats broken..

When I started typing the title of this post it was going to be all about Starbucks, Amazon etc etc.. But it might turn out to be about a letter to a group of Christians written about 2000 years ago.

But while you decide if you want to read on here is a pretty starbucks picture!


So Starbucks haven't paid corporation tax. I can talk more about them than the others because its in the news a little more. But neither have they broken any laws. In fact they have done exactly what this government seems to enjoy. They have been a savvy company. They have employed people who are good at their job to help them make the most money.

And now we express outrage.

There is something quintessentially British about it- please don't be good at anything.
But that is almost not the point. The point is that the law is broken. The law has holes in it that mean that if you play the game you can get away without contributing to the wider society. (though Starbucks give free coffee to community events, host all kinds of meetings, so maybe its not all about the money).

In short (as as we might see in the next few days from some more companies) the law on its own is not enough. The letter of the law has us finding ways round the law to do what we want. It only works when we get hold of the relational element of the law. In starbucks case its that sense that the people who walk into your coffee shops on their way to work want you to contribute because they do. They pay their £2.40 out of their taxed pay and want you to do the same so that the street they will return to feels clean and safe.

Our tax laws are broken. But the law itself will never be enough. Where there is law we need relationship- we need a sense that the law is worth keeping because we feel connected to the whole.

And in the mean time we need grace. These companies have been good at what they do. And so let us challenge, but let us also show grace and show them how to connect to the relational.

Comments

SwindonG said…
you mss the point that even though it is doing why the Government wants it to that the Government does not necessarily represent the people and they have disconnected themselves fon the electorate - IMHO

Popular posts from this blog

Remembering What I Enjoy..

Occasionally I forget things. Some stuff like birthdays, names and stuff is a normal human thing, and I don't sweat it so much. But I also forget some other stuff which is not so good. I forget what I enjoy. I don't know how it happens but it does from time to time. And its at these moments that I need a bit of help remembering. So- this is a request for help. What do I enjoy doing? What gives me joy? Leave me a comment.

A Broadside: *plot spoiler* for Tory sympathisers

Today some alarming social equality data was released. It said what we all know: if you are poor, you have less opportunities in life. For every £100 a month less income than the median you start school one month behind developmentally. Your vocabulary aged 5 is half what it is for a rich kid if you are in the bottom ten percent of income. Housing tenure stats are even worse. "Only 4 per cent of those of working age living in social housing have degrees, and nearly half have no or only low qualifications. Only half of men and 42 per cent of women of working age living in social housing are in paid work, compared with 89 per cent of men and 81 per cent of women in households with a mortgage." Social housing: by its nature, is grouped (london people ignore this, you are the freaks not the norm). That means that we have allowed ghettoes of poverty and low attainment (not just in a SATS way either). Now it would be easy, and some daft Tory has already done it, to pin this on