Skip to main content

On Weddings..

This week I have been watching the news a little like one watches a tense thriller.. Slightly hiding behind my fingers in case the very worst happens.

The scene which I fear playing out is one where the characters start tearing into each other but many people are caught up into the cross fire.

As you can probably tell, I am talking about marriage.

Once again communication around what marriage should be is getting muddied and sullied and people are getting hurt and are not listening to each other.

So- here's my thinking.

I want out of marriage. I think I would like the Church of England to drop its legal function in marrying people (of any gender combination).

Why- well my reasons are many and varied but include.
The idea of marriage goes back way beyond the day that the CofE got the right to do the legal bit. If we rid ourselves of the civil obligations it will create a helpful space for the church to think about (both locally and nationally) what it thinks about 'marriage'.

It will give churches the chance to offer blessing and celebration to those who are part of the faith community or who want to seek God's blessing after doing the legal paperwork bit. And the church can do that locally according to the conscience of the group of believers gathered there. It can be done on an individual level with preparation offered in a way that I'm not sure it can be when there are legal bits involved.

It will help in terms of the ever increasingly burden of paperwork involved in marrying those without UK residency.

It will prompt a helpful debate in the evangelical wings of the church about the obsession with the nuclear family (which is also pretty modernistic). it will also help the church full stop to consider its role as one of many societal forces that can be engaged for human flourishing and will help us to offer ourselves in humility (rather than as gatekeeper).

I am going to stop there- feel free to engage in the conversation.


Comments

Anonymous said…
I pretty much agree with all of that. If there is a separation of legal and religious understandings of marriage, it will probably lower the temperature of debate a little...
But wouldn't doing this raise other issues of church & state??
Anonymous said…
an acceptable compromise for all, but it ignores how the Church can isolate gay Christians generally
Jude said…
Andy 1- I'm not too worried about being out of that relationship.. would like some voice of unelected wisdom in the Lords but doesn't have to be Bishops.

Andy 2- you are right- as church we have fumbled and blustered and been downright awful.. we get into 'out there' fights about things in the abstract and then fail to actually include and work it out person by person.. I'm sorry that so many have been hurt.

Popular posts from this blog

Remembering What I Enjoy..

Occasionally I forget things. Some stuff like birthdays, names and stuff is a normal human thing, and I don't sweat it so much. But I also forget some other stuff which is not so good. I forget what I enjoy. I don't know how it happens but it does from time to time. And its at these moments that I need a bit of help remembering. So- this is a request for help. What do I enjoy doing? What gives me joy? Leave me a comment.

A Broadside: *plot spoiler* for Tory sympathisers

Today some alarming social equality data was released. It said what we all know: if you are poor, you have less opportunities in life. For every £100 a month less income than the median you start school one month behind developmentally. Your vocabulary aged 5 is half what it is for a rich kid if you are in the bottom ten percent of income. Housing tenure stats are even worse. "Only 4 per cent of those of working age living in social housing have degrees, and nearly half have no or only low qualifications. Only half of men and 42 per cent of women of working age living in social housing are in paid work, compared with 89 per cent of men and 81 per cent of women in households with a mortgage." Social housing: by its nature, is grouped (london people ignore this, you are the freaks not the norm). That means that we have allowed ghettoes of poverty and low attainment (not just in a SATS way either). Now it would be easy, and some daft Tory has already done it, to pin this on