Skip to main content

Back to the edge

This is another of those postings where I am avoiding doing what I have on my to do list (including going to the gym...). I just caught a news story from the Archbishop of York (second highest churchman in the Church of England, possibly in the Anglican commune). According to the BBC he is saying that we would be hard pressed to call Britain a Christian country any more. To read more click here


Hallelujah.

The day when we all acknowledge that reality will be a great day for the Kingdom in this country. It will allow the church (including the established church which many of us 'emergents' have taken to knocking), to take its place back on the edge. We will not have to be a bastion of "British society"; which I think means being very nice and not offending anyone. Whether we like it or not being aligned with the state and all its institutions is a huge hindrance to the purposes of the church. With this alignment we have become an institution with all the stuff that goes with it (oppression of the poor, vested interests, compromise for the sake of self perpetuation).

When we are no longer seen as 'relevant' to this society, we will be able to refocus on what it really means to fulfill Jesus great commission. We will be able to live out a generation call to be John the Baptists. By that I mean that we will be freed to talk about not having too much, about not oppressing or extorting people. And more than just talk we will be able to live. In short we can get on with living and establishing the Kingdom of God. That excites me, I could go on but this is a blog post not an essay... for now lets just say:

Bring it on!



Comments

Liz said…
Ah, this reminds me of various trainings I had a few years ago on Christendom and institutionalised Christianity, and the like. I think you may have taken some, actually...

Also in that article you linked to: I love that he's leaving the bureaucracy of being Archbishop to end his days as a little rural parish priest. I think that's beautiful.
Jude said…
Liz, was I saying the same then as now? The problem with being opinionated is that I have to say sorry lots... so sorry
Liz said…
Please don't apologise - agree with everything :o)
Kate John said…
1st of all- oh my word i think i just worked out how this thing works
Secondly,
I think you're right, absolutely, in the sense that with a dis-established church, Christians could get back to being radical love-givers, peace-makers, poor-servers, AND be seen as such. But i think we should make sure we realise what we're praying for (and be ready for it): because in this 'terrorism age' where radical beliefs are feared, the only thing protecting Christians from persecution is 'the establishment' and the perception that we're just weak sissys. Once the church is dis-established and we start showing (as a whole church) that we're passionate, radical people who ARE different (even if that's by serving)- society will fear the difference, probably label us extremist intolerants and persecute us. Or not. Just a theory.
Still think it's better than being beige though.

Popular posts from this blog

Remembering What I Enjoy..

Occasionally I forget things. Some stuff like birthdays, names and stuff is a normal human thing, and I don't sweat it so much. But I also forget some other stuff which is not so good. I forget what I enjoy. I don't know how it happens but it does from time to time. And its at these moments that I need a bit of help remembering. So- this is a request for help. What do I enjoy doing? What gives me joy? Leave me a comment.

A Broadside: *plot spoiler* for Tory sympathisers

Today some alarming social equality data was released. It said what we all know: if you are poor, you have less opportunities in life. For every £100 a month less income than the median you start school one month behind developmentally. Your vocabulary aged 5 is half what it is for a rich kid if you are in the bottom ten percent of income. Housing tenure stats are even worse. "Only 4 per cent of those of working age living in social housing have degrees, and nearly half have no or only low qualifications. Only half of men and 42 per cent of women of working age living in social housing are in paid work, compared with 89 per cent of men and 81 per cent of women in households with a mortgage." Social housing: by its nature, is grouped (london people ignore this, you are the freaks not the norm). That means that we have allowed ghettoes of poverty and low attainment (not just in a SATS way either). Now it would be easy, and some daft Tory has already done it, to pin this on